exploring probable contingencies calculating calibrated wisdom calculating quantitative estimations assembling precise forecasts modeling calibrated estimations mapping the future formulating quantitative estimations composing precise insights forecasting calibrated understanding composing predictive contingencies assembling probable forecasts modeling quantitative insights modeling contingent forecasts forecasting accurate forecasts


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Conditional on high-level machine intelligence by 2039, is Alphabet's share price correct to within $300B?

Whereas some AI researchers (and Metaculus AI questions) have substantial credence in high-level machine intelligence (HLMI) being developed within only a few decades, others have argued that the stock market provides evidence against this view (see, for example, this blog post).

The claim is that if HLMI was close, the market capitalisations of tech companies should be much higher than what we're seeing, given the presumed huge economic advantage of the company developing it.

Yet things might not be so simple. If we start with a tech giant's owning a large fraction of world output, and multiply through by the uncertainty of their actually achieving world dominance, stocks being potentially worthless due to bad corporate governance and eventual institutional collapse following HLMI, and so forth; we might get to a point where current prices do make sense.

Moreover, Robin Hanson published a paper 20 years ago arguing that the stock markets at that time did support an upcoming period of a fast exponential "growth mode", following three previous such shifts in human history: "hunting", "farming", and "industry".

To get a better sense of this disagreement, we ask:

Conditional on human-level machine intelligence in less than 20 years from 2019, is Alphabet's share price correct to within $300B?

The focus on Alphabet can be justified by noting their dominance in terms of for-profit labs dedicated to AGI (consider for example that DeepMind's close to 1000 employees constitutes by far the largest effort explicitly dedicated to pursuing AGI, and that the number of papers accepted papers by DeepMind and Google Brain to NeurIPS 2017 was almost twice that of the second ranked institution).


We shall use AI Impacts definition and say that “High-level machine intelligence” (HLMI) is achieved when unaided machines can accomplish every task better and more cheaply than human workers.

Alphabet's share price refers to the price of Class A shares (non-insider shares with voting power), with ticker NASDAQ: GOOGL.

We shall say that a share price is correct if it is equal to whatever the time-discounted sum of returns (in the form of dividends, buybacks, acquisitions and other premiums such as voting power) turns out to be.

There are some resolution subtleties which make this question more experimental than most other questions.

First, in the world where the conditional of this question has been verifiably satisfied, the likelihood of this site existing in a similar format, and an admin taking the time to resolve this question, is fairly low.

Second, the correct prediction changes as Alphabet's share price does.

Hence, the purpose of this question is to experiment with a way of eliciting reasonable, quantified discussion and aggregation of thoughts on the stock market's predicting HLMI; rather than winning Metaculus points.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.