Question
Facebook Twitter
  • Copy Link
    •
  • Approval
  • Set Reminder
  • Share private question
  • Unsubscribe from question
  • Invite Coauthors
  • Remove myself
  • View Metaculus Prediction
  • {{qctrl.question.communityIsHidden ? 'Show' : 'Hide'}} Community Prediction
    •

    Your submission is now a Draft.

    Once it's ready, please submit your draft for review by our team of Community Moderators. Thank you!

    You have been invited to co-author this question.

    When it is ready, the author will submit it for review by Community Moderators. Thanks for helping!

    Pending

    This question now needs to be approved by community moderators.

    You have been invited to co-author this question.

    It now needs to be approved by community moderators. Thanks for helping!

    Will the United States' Field-Weighted Citation Impact of AI research be at least 0.5 higher than China’s in 2019?

    Created by Tamay and
    co-authors , {{coauthor.username}}
    on {{qctrl.question.created_time | dateStr}}

    Question

    Background

    Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) is an indicator of the citation impact of a publication. It is calculated by comparing the number of citations actually received by a publication with the number of citations expected for a publication of the same document type, publication year, and subject. FWCI is always defined with reference to a global baseline of 1.0 and intrinsically accounts for differences in citation accrual over time, differences in citation rates for different document ages (e.g., older documents are expected to have accrued more citations than more recently published documents), document types (e.g., reviews typically attract more citations than research articles), and subjects (e.g., publications in medicine accrue citations more quickly than publications in mathematics).

    Computer science research is disseminated in a variety of publication types (e.g., journals, conferences, etc.) and forms (e.g., software, code, etc.). Thus, while article citations may not fully capture research impact in the AI field, they nevertheless play a relevant role, especially for comparative benchmarking of entities on scholarly impact.

    According to Elsevier's 2018 AI report (pg54) (also downloadable here) China’s AI research currently has a FWCI of 0.96, whilst the US has an impact of 1.49. The difference has historically been larger, with the US output typically just short of 1 FWCI point higher than China's.

    Will US Field-Weighted Citation Impact of AI research remain at least 0.5 higher than China’s in Elsevier's 2019 report?

    Resolution

    For this question, we will follow the methodology in Elsevier's 2018 AI report, which refers to refer to the data published by Scopus (Elsevier’s abstract and citation database of peer reviewed literature). This question resolves positive if the U.S. has a FWCI of its AI research output (across all document types) in 2019 that exceeds China's by 0.5 or more, and negative otherwise.

    Categories:
    Other sociological, economic, geopolitical questions – China
    Other sociological, economic, geopolitical questions – Publication statistics

    Make a Prediction

    Prediction

    Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

    Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

    Current points depend on your prediction, the community's prediction, and the result. Your total earned points are averaged over the lifetime of the question, so predict early to get as many points as possible! See the FAQ.