Metaculus Help: Spread the word
If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.
Will the United States' Field-Weighted Citation Impact of AI research be at least 0.5 higher than China’s in 2019?
Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) is an indicator of the citation impact of a publication. It is calculated by comparing the number of citations actually received by a publication with the number of citations expected for a publication of the same document type, publication year, and subject. FWCI is always defined with reference to a global baseline of 1.0 and intrinsically accounts for differences in citation accrual over time, differences in citation rates for different document ages (e.g., older documents are expected to have accrued more citations than more recently published documents), document types (e.g., reviews typically attract more citations than research articles), and subjects (e.g., publications in medicine accrue citations more quickly than publications in mathematics).
Computer science research is disseminated in a variety of publication types (e.g., journals, conferences, etc.) and forms (e.g., software, code, etc.). Thus, while article citations may not fully capture research impact in the AI field, they nevertheless play a relevant role, especially for comparative benchmarking of entities on scholarly impact.
According to Elsevier's 2018 AI report (pg54) (also downloadable here) China’s AI research currently has a FWCI of 0.96, whilst the US has an impact of 1.49. The difference has historically been larger, with the US output typically just short of 1 FWCI point higher than China's.
Will US Field-Weighted Citation Impact of AI research remain at least 0.5 higher than China’s in Elsevier's 2019 report?
For this question, we will follow the methodology in Elsevier's 2018 AI report, which refers to refer to the data published by Scopus (Elsevier’s abstract and citation database of peer reviewed literature). This question resolves positive if the U.S. has a FWCI of its AI research output (across all document types) in 2019 that exceeds China's by 0.5 or more, and negative otherwise.
Metaculus help: Predicting
Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.
The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.
The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.
This question is not yet open for predictions.
Metaculus help: Community Stats
Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.
When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.