Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will an AI system be able to play new levels of Angry Birds better than the best human players in the 2019 IJCAI Angry Birds AI competition?

This question is identical to the 2020 IJCAI Angry Birds question except for the date.

Angry Birds is a game requiring prediction of the physics-based effects of different-property flying-impaired projectiles on various structures. This includes aiming the birds, using their varied properties, and using explosions and other effects.

For several years, an Angry Birds AI competition has been held to evaluate and encourage game-playing ML systems to play Angry Birds. In this competition the entrants are provided "a basic game playing software that includes a computer vision module, a trajectory planning module, and the game interface that works with the Chrome version of Angry Birds."

Part of the competition is an Man vs Machine Challenge, pitting the best ML systems against highly skilled humans.

Thus far no AI program has outscored the best humans. In the 2016 competition, the human and AI players competed on four levels over the course of 10 minutes. Although some AIs completed four levels, none completed all four (some humans did, albeit with difficulty.) The best human players ended with approximately double the best AI scores. This is actually a bit less good than a followup to the 2015 challenge in which an AI came within a factor of 2/3 of the best human scores.


The question will resolve as ambiguous if neither the IJCAI Angry Birds AI competition nor any other similar competition runs in 2019. It will be left to the informed discretion of the admins what counts as a "similar competition" -- the gist of the question is whether Angry Birds will be verifiably solved.


Data on competitions from 2012 to 2017 can be found here: And highly limited data on 2018 here:…


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.