exploring definitive wisdom mapping quantitative wisdom calculating critical forecasts aggregating predictive contingencies modeling definitive understanding mapping the future formulating critical futures mapping critical insights forecasting definitive contingencies composing calibrated predictions exploring quantitative understanding formulating predictive contingencies forecasting accurate estimations mapping accurate forecasts


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

When will an unsupervised language model get to human level performance on the Winograd Schema Challenge?

GPT-2 was a major step forward for language models, but it's still not at human level performance in meaningful text generation and reasoning (for discussion on the nuances of this point, see this and this).

One of the top benchmarks for this type of reasoning is the Winograd Schema challenge.

Rather than base the test on the sort of short free-form conversation suggested by the Turing Test, the Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) poses a set of multiple-choice questions that have a particular form.

Q. The trophy would not fit in the brown suitcase because it was too big (small). What was too big (small)?

  • Answer 0: the trophy
  • Answer 1: the suitcase

GPT-2 scored a 70.70% on the 140 Q&A dataset, while human performance is at 92%+. It beat the previous record of 63.7%, but it's still a long way from human level performance.

When will an unsupervised language model get to human level performance (>=92%) on the Winograd Schema Challenge?


The date of the model will be set as the date of the first credible public release (e.g. blog post, pre-print, peer-reviewed paper). The question will resolve retroactively one week prior to this date.

An unsupervised language model will be defined as one that has not been trained specifically to maximise WSC score. (For example, GPT-2 was trained to predict the next word in long text sequences.) If the models parameters have been pre-trained on another dataset/objective function, but are then fine-tuned to fit the WSC challenge, the model does not count as unsupervised.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.

Embed this question

You can use the below code snippet to embed this question on your own webpage. Feel free to change the height and width to suit your needs.