modeling accurate estimations delivering critical forecasts formulating critical predictions delivering intelligent predictions composing definitive estimations mapping the future modeling calibrated forecasts delivering critical forecasts modeling accurate insights forecasting probable forecasts aggregating probable predictions aggregating critical estimations mapping definitive estimations generating critical predictions

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

In 2021, what percentage of papers published on arXiv in the Computer Science and Statistics categories will include “reinforcement Learning” in the title?

This question also has a mid-2019 version and a 2025 version.


Deep reinforcement learning is currently the dominant paradigm for pursuing AGI. Thinking about whether this will remain the case has some important implications, as there is major controversy over whether this particular framework for building AI -- opaque, agenty, neural network-like systems trained by gradient descent on an objective -- can be safely aligned with human values at all (c.f. Paul Christiano on Prosaic AI alignment, a reply from Eliezer Yudkowsky, and Eric Drexler on the Comprehensive AI Services Model).


Resolution

The final metric will be determined using the arXiv advanced search feature for papers in the computer science OR statistics categories (including cross-listed papers) with terms "RL" OR "reinforcement learning" in the title (using quotes to search for exact matches), between January 1 and December 31 2021.


Data

Previous values of this metric since 1991, as well as counts for the phrase "reinforcement learning" in abstracts, can be found in this spreadsheet.

Most recent values:

2019 (thus far): 2.1%

2018: 1.51%

2017: 0.93%

2016: 0.49%

2015: 0.25%

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.