Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will LeelaChessZero beat Stockfish in the Jan/Feb 2019 Top Chess Engine Championship?

Another opportunity for a very short-term prediction.

LeelaChessZero is a community-built chess engine that attempts to replicate DeepMind's methodology and success. They don't have the budget of DeepMind to train LeelaZero the way that AlphaZero was trained; instead, they crowdsource the training process, getting online volunteers to run self-play games on their home computers.

It will soon face Stockfish, the current reigning champion chess engine, in the TCEC Championship. (AlphaZero, which can beat Stockfish, is not part of this tournament.)

According to this announcement blog post,

Now there will be a 100 games match between Leela and Stockfish with 120 minutes + 15 seconds per move time control. This will be held after the TCEC CUP that starts on 21 January 2019. Cup is expected to last 15-20 days. The Leela net that will be used there is yet to be decided but it would probably be a test 30 net and not a test 40 net since test 40 is yet too immature. Stockfish will probably use the latest development version at that time.

So we ask:

Will LeelaChessZero beat Stockfish in the ongoing Top Chess Engine Championship (TCEC)?


This question will resolve positive if TCEC declares LeelaChessZero to have beaten Stockfish in the aforementioned 100-game superfinal. In the event that TCEC does not declare a winner, this question will resolve positive if we can determine that LCZ won more games than Stockfish won, out of those 100. Otherwise, this question will resolve negative.

On the one hand, LeelaChessZero is supposed to be like AlphaZero and AlphaZero crushed Stockfish. On the other hand, LeelaChessZero may have less training time and a less expert team of creators. (Allegedly LCZ has roughly 23 million games of training, AZ has 44 million.) On the prehensile tail, maybe AlphaZero's success won't replicate for some scandalous reason.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.