Metaculus Help: Spread the word
If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.
By end of 2019, what will be the maximum batch size used in training by a published AI system?
Two things determine how much compute it is useful to throw at training an AI system: first, economics (the supply and demand for compute, which determine when the cost becomes infeasible). Second, parallelizability.
To understand this concept, suppose you wanted to add up a list of 1000 numbers. If you could get 10 friends to come in and help you, you could add up 100 numbers each and finish the task much faster. The task is parallelizable. However, suppose you wanted to list all the numbers in the Fibonacci sequence (where each entry is the sum of the two preceding it). Then having 10 friends join you wouldn’t be as helpful, since to compute every new number in the sequence you need to know what the last number was. So you all couldn’t just race ahead at different speeds.
Similarly, in order for researchers to benefit from larger compute, they must find ways of parallelising their training, either by splitting the data and running many instances of the same model across many machines, or by splitting the model itself in a way which can be efficiently parallelized.
Batch sizes of 8 thousand [GDG+17], 16 thousand [SKYL17], 32 thousand [YGG17, YZH+17, ASF17], and even 64 thousand [JSH+18] examples have been effectively employed to train ImageNet, and batch sizes of thousands have been effective for language models and generative models [OEGA18, PKYC18, BDS18].
This phenomenon is not confined to supervised learning: in reinforcement learning, batch sizes of over a million timesteps (with tens of thousands of environments running in parallel) have been used in a Dota-playing agent [BCD+18], and even in simple Atari environments batch sizes of several thousand timesteps have proved effective [AAG+18, HQB+18, SA18]
We now ask:
By Jan 1, 2020, what will be the maximum batch size used in training by a published AI system?
A “published AI system” is a system that is the topic of a published research paper, pre-print or credible blogpost. In order to be admissible, the paper/blog post must give sufficient information to estimate training compute, within some error threshold.
The current record is a batch size of ~8.4M observations, by OpenAI's 1v1 Dota bot.
We have yet to compile an outside of the historical growth in batch sizes. Contributions here are very welcome!
Metaculus help: Predicting
Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.
The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.
The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.
This question is not yet open for predictions.
Metaculus help: Community Stats
Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.
When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.