Metaculus Help: Spread the word
If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.
By mid-2020, will a government researcher be publicly involved in an experiment using more compute than AlphaStar?
This is related to the questions of:
- whether an AI safety experiment will use as much compute as AlphaGo Zero by mid-2020
- whether an experiment in academia will use as much compute as AlphaGo Zero by mid-2020
- what the maximum compute used in training by a published AI system will be by mid-2020
- when and by how much the trend will slow down
In order for the incredibly fast AI Compute trend to be sustainable more than a few years, government involvement seems necessary (at current rates Amazon and Alphabet’s R&D budgets of $20B would be reached in 2021-2022, but during the Apollo and Manhattan projects, the US government spent around $200B/year on R&D).
In early 2019, a government experiment seems to have set a new compute record by using the world’s most powerful non-distributed computer, IBM Summit, to run machine learning models of climate change. Anthony writes:
the Summit supercomputer [uses] 27,000 graphics processors. It seems this can run at a sustained 1 exaFLOPS, but amusingly this is only half of what DeepMind apparently used in training alphastar.
We now ask:
By July 1st 2020, will a government researcher be involved in running an experiment using >=31.000 pfs-days of compute, as evidenced by a blog post, paper, pre-print or other credible source (giving enough information to estimate compute within some error bars)?
(For reference, the Metaculus AI crowd estimates AlphaStar to have used 21.000 to 31.000, with 50% confidence, as of April 14.)
A government shall be defined as being involved in an experiment if at least one co-author (or contributor of similar standing) is employed by a government institution, and worked on the experiment primarily as part of that role. (So, for example, it would not count if someone was part-time at Facebook and part-time at Institution XYZ, conducted the experiment at Facebook, and was cited by their Facebook title.)
The compute refers to the amount of compute used for training of the final system. The method of calculation of compute should be as similar as possible to that used in the "AI and compute" article.
Resolution date will be retroactively set to one week prior to an eventual credible report.
Metaculus help: Predicting
Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.
The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.
The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.
This question is not yet open for predictions.
Metaculus help: Community Stats
Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.
When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.