Metaculus Help: Spread the word
If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.
By 2021, will a neural model reach >=70% performance on a high school mathematics exam?
This question was suggested by zakeeulhaq, who also did extensive background research.
A recent paper by DeepMind (Saxton et al., 2019) analyzes the mathematical reasoning ability of neural models; using the Transformer model (Vaswani et al., 2017). Their best mark was 35% in a high school mathematics exam (questions sampled from a UK GCSE Edexcel Higher Tier paper, 2012-2013). The set of questions covered algebra, arithmetic, calculus, polynomial factorization and elementary probability theory.
See here for an accessible video introduction to the paper. More in-depth background is given in a comment below, citing zakeeulhaq’s notes.
We now ask:
By Jan 1st 2021, will there EITHER…
… be a credible report of a neural model with a score of >=70% on the task suite used in the 2019 DeepMind paper…
OR be judged by a council of experts that it’s 95% likely such a model could be implemented, were a sufficiently competent lab to try… 
OR be a neural model with performance on another benchmark judge by a council of experts to be equally impressive, with 95% confidence?
For purposes of resolution, these terms are interpreted in accordance with the Technical AI Forecasting Resolution Dictionary v0.2.0. Any term whose interpretation deliberately departs from this standard has been marked with a ^."
In particular, a credible report is defined as any item in:
Blog-post co-authored by at least one of the researchers
Pre-print posted to arXiv or similar
Peer-reviewed (published) paper
Second-hand report from a trusted source providing at least as much information as the median acceptable blog post
 The point of this counterfactual resolution condition is as follows. Not all trajectories to advanced AI pass by solving a high school maths exam. For example, it is possible that DeepMind were to impressively solve symbolic reasoning in full generality, and yet drop this particular line of research. In such a world, there might be a point at which it is clear that the feat in the question is achievable, even though no one has actually bothered to implement the experiment.
This is similar to how the release of the AlphaZero agent (playing chess, Go and shogi) should give us >=95% confidence that it is possible to play Othello at superhuman level without domain-specific knowledge, even though no one (to the author's knowledge) ran that experiment.
The exact composition and structure of the council will be announced soon, we’re currently recruiting members here.
Metaculus help: Predicting
Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.
The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.
The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.
This question is not yet open for predictions.
Metaculus help: Community Stats
Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.
When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.